Submissions
Consultation on the draft principles of a National Water Agreement. Discussion Paper September 2024
The GVIA support the original aims of a nationally compatible market, regulatory and planning based system of managing surface and
groundwater resources for rural and urban use that optimises economic, social and environmental outcomes. We note that the establishment of
water access entitlements (water rights) and planning arrangements to manage competing demands, are central to delivering these objectives.
The GVIA however are frustrated by the continued minimal open transparent engagement with all Australians now and during the
development stages of the draft principles included in the NWA. Additionally, we are concerned that 20 years of challenging water reform
across Australia has been disregarded. The National Water Initiative (NWI) was a foundation document that worked towards delivering a
balanced approach to water management across Australia. It has made significant progress to address overallocation with the Murray Darling
Basin (MDB) water take now well below Sustainable Diversion Limits (SDL). The NWA needs to move beyond over allocation acknowledging that
it is no longer the major challenge impacting the health of our rivers, and address means to optimise outcomes from water for
environmental, cultural, social and economic objectives.
The GVIA are concerned by the manner in which changes are being rushed through, and do not believe many of the principles are either
appropriate to be included in a National Water Agreement or are fit-for-purpose as they have not been appropriately analysed nor discussed
transparently with the state jurisdictions or those directly impacted by the principles.
Discussion Paper – Seeking views on a future national water agreement May 2024
We support the original aims of a nationally compatible market, regulatory and planning based system of managing surface and groundwater
resources for rural and urban use that optimises economic, social and environmental outcomes. We however are frustrated that the federal
department have released the discussion paper now. That there has been minimal open transparent engagement across all Australians now and
during the development stages of The Paper. Additionally, we are concerned that 20 years of challenging water reform across Australia has
been disregarded.
The organisation agrees that it is important to future proof the foundations of Australian water management and planning and address gaps
through modernising. As such we recommend that the DCCEEW modernise the existing National Water Initiative 2004 in line with recommendations
from the Productivity Commissions 2024 National Water Reform Interim report.
We do not agree that a re-write as signalled in the current discussion paper is necessary.
GVIA submission DCCEEW Draft 450GL Framework March 2024
GVIA submission DCCEEW Draft 450GL Framework March 2024
The Water Amendment Act 2023 has made changes to the Water Act 2007 and the Basin Plan 2012. These amendments lifted the cap on
buybacks, changed the way the 450GL can be recovered and removed the initial objectives of the 450GL from the southern connected
system to the whole basin.
The original Murray Darling Basin Plan 2012 (the Plan) has achieved a significant amount, a fact the government should be actively
promoting.
Bridging the Gap is a crucial program aiming to achieve the valley based Sustainable Diversion Limit targets but there is concern that buy
backs continue to result in “incidental over recovery”. As a valley directly impacted by over recovery, the Gwydir can assure you that the
local community does not see the recovery of water over and above that required by the Basin Plan as “incidental”.
The GVIA appreciate that the extension of the timeframe for delivery was a practical step to push for the completion of the Plan. We are
disappointed that the principle of the Plan; a healthy working basin with optimised social, economic and environmental outcomes, has been
overshadowed by politics and that the focus is on volumes as opposed to the environmental outcomes, that include productive and resilient
water dependent industries and communities with confidence in their long-term future.
The Government must recognise that simply adding more water is not the solution. Complementary measures such as fish passage, and progress
on constraints measures as noted in 7.09 need to be implemented as they play an important role in water quality and the ability to get water
to areas in the southern basin.
NRC review of Gwydir Regulated WSP
Recently the GVIA submitted to the Natural Resources Commission review into the Gwydir Regulated Water Sharing Plan. The Submission included a range of recommendations covering how the plan contributed to environmental, social, cultural and economic outcomes. We raised concerns regarding the use of section 324 temporary restriction orders, FPH zones and trade limitations, channel capacity and the need for the Minister’s decision regarding supplementary water events to rigorously assess the potential for small supplementary flows in the Gwydir to contribute to the Barwon-Darling requirements. The GVIA recommended that there needed to be greater certainty for stakeholders around these limits and decisions to implement any limits or restrictions to supplementary access, to achieve Schedule 2 outcomes, a framework should be established as part of the long-term planning arrangements.
Read MoreWater Amendment Bill 2023
The GVIA submission included 9 recommendations. In principle the extension of the time frames is constructive, there are however so other issues which are concerning. The following recommendations were included in the submission;
The GVIA recommends that over-recovered water be returned to the Valleys where it was acquired to enhance the
sustainability of the environment and the communities within those valleys. We do not support the allocation of water that cannot contribute
to environmental outcomes in the southern connected system being allocated to the 450GL water for the environment.
The GVIA recommends that socio-economic criteria for all programs under the 450GL target remain.
The GVIA recommends the reinstatement of the 1,500GL limit on water purchases.
The GVIA recommends the removal of “from time to time” to be replaced with a fixed time period, aligning with the completion all other
measures within the Murray Darling Basin Plan (2012).
Unregulated water sharing plan review
The GVIA provided the following submission to the Natural Resources Commission on their 10-year statutory review into the Unregulated Water Sharing Plans in the region.
We are now following up with the agencies key recommendations from the review including the WaterNSW licencing information and an urgent
review of trade restrictions.
Thank you to all our members who helped inform this submission and completed our survey.
5-year Review into Gwydir Floodplain Management Plan
The Gwydir Valley Irrigators Association provides a high-level review into some of the issues on behalf of our members. We have encouraged
our members to raise specific, farm-scale issues as part of this process.
Since the finalisation of the FMP for the Gwydir Valley Floodplain, three other valleys have also progressed through development and
implementation as well as, the completion of many of the outstanding legacy applications, applied for prior to 2008 and gazetted in 2016.
The five-year review is therefore an opportunity to ensure consistency in planning arrangements (where applicable) but also incorporate new
information that has come to light since its implementation.
GVIA provides input into IPART pricing determination
The GVIA provided their formal submission to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of NSW’s draft determination on maximum prices
for both WaterNSW’s Rural Bulk Water Delivery and Water Administration Ministerial Corporation (WAMC) in NSW, from 2021. This
was a follow up from previous presentations to IPART NSW at the public hearings.
The GVIA outlined a number of core issues saying "The upward trend in prices has continued for many pricing proposals, well above
inflation at a time when many water users have had diminishing water availability and diminishing services. More work must be undertaken
between the regulator and the agencies, with stakeholders to curtail this ongoing, upward trend."
" These key issues stem from our ongoing concern that water users will continue to wear the financial and reputational impact of the
current and past performance of NSW water agencies. This is then reflected in increased revenue proposals by the agencies. The
actions of the Natural Resources Access Regulator this week, to create media controversy with inadequate and misleading data to promote
themselves demonstrates our concerns." the submission said.
Prices changes were variable across the different water users, with the highest increases in the regulated system with 28% for High
Security charges and 16% usage charge increase also.
GVIA Submission on FPH WSP Rules
The GVIA provided a formal written submission into the Proposed Water Sharing Plan rules for the Gwydir Regulated and Unregulated Water Sources. Saying that the finalisation of licencing of floodplain harvesting cannot be delayed any longer, 20-years is enough. The results of the Gwydir region should be reason enough to reaffirm this commitment with 30% of the long-term water take outside of the
current, contemporary licencing framework.
The establishment of volumetric licences within the Water Management Act 2000 for floodplain harvesting does not create new water but
rather, is recognising this existing historical form of access in the current regulatory framework. Key regulations consulted on at the end of 2020, must be put to government to enable this transition to occur.
Without enabling the licencing framework and then implementing valley-based compliance through water sharing plan rules, this form of take
remains unmanaged, unmetered and unaccounted for which is not in the interests of any stakeholder. An analysis of stakeholder views
presented in Attachment A, highlights there is strong commitment to licencing across a broad spectrum of interests but that other water
management issues are being conflated as part of the debate.
Proposed amendments for FPH
The GVIA provided a submission into the NSW Government during their consultation on proposed amendment for floodplain harvesting in NSW. These included
- Water Management (General) Amendment (Floodplain Harvesting) Regulation 2020
- Water Management (General) Amendment (Floodplain Harvesting Measurement) Regulation 2020
- Water Management (General) Amendment (Exemption for Rainfall Run-off Collection) Regulation 2020
- Water Management (General) Amendment (Floodplain Harvesting Exemptions) Regulation 2020
We recognise the importance of this historical reform for our members, our community and communities everywhere. It is imperative that NSW continues to move forward with how they manage, account and report on water take by water users and floodplain harvesting must be licenced in NSW. We see these proposed amendment for floodplain harvesting in NSW within these four proposed regulations.
There are broad benefits of implementing this reform that should be acknowledged and can only be achieved once licensing is fully implemented.
Read More
GVIA Provides Submission into the Independant Assessment into the Norther Basin First Flush
GVIA providing a submission into the Independent Panel's Assessment of the Northern Basin First Flush saying.
The Northern Basin 2020 First Flush event was unprecedented in uniting stakeholders around the Northern Basin in demanding the NSW
Government do better at managing competing critical needs in times of drought. It became obvious that during the event, in the absence of a
clear and transparent set of rules that set a strong framework to address competing critical needs in the well-defined scope of the public
interest, the event would be seen as unduly influenced by one or another set of stakeholders.
With this in mind, we largely support the recommendations proposed by the panel. However, we do offer a number of suggestions to be
considered in the process of refining the final report included opportunities to improve data gaps and improve the information base for
future discussions. Of importance is an independent and thorough assessment of flow outcomes and alternative scenarios. Without fully
understanding a range of scenarios, we cannot fully objectively review the event and properly inform any future debate about improved
frameworks. Without this information we may very well focus on a range of reforms that may or may not be required.